Tanthongsack v. Crawford et al
| Kongmany Tanthongsack |
| Matthew Albence, Ronald Vitiello, Fod Hott, Thomas Homan, Nathalies Asher, Marlen Pineiro, William Barr, Jeffrey Crawford and Kevin McAlleenan |
| 3:2019cv00340 |
| May 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Roderick C Young |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail sent to Kongmany Tanthongsck returned as undeliverable re #3 Memorandum Opinion & #4 Order. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smej, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Petitioner advised of right to appeal within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 05/28/2019. (Copy sent to Petitioner) (smej, )
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 05/28/2019. (Copy sent to Petitioner) (smej, ) |
| Filing 2 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Konmany Tanthongsack @ Farmville Detention Center (tjoh, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing Fee: $5 Receipt Number: 34683043750), filed by Kongmany Tanthongsack. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Receipt, #3 Envelope) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
