Prasad v. Hutton et al
Sundari K. Prasad |
Judge C. Hutton, Roberto Chavez and Dr. Larry Volz |
3:2019cv00370 |
May 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Roderick C Young |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION "Jane Doe Request" by Sundari K. Prasad. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope) (smej, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE "Judicial Immunity Action" by Sundari K. Prasad. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope) (smej, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE "Addendum" by Sundari K. Prasad. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smej, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Reopen Case by Sundari K. Prasad. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tjoh, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER - It is ORDERED that: Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff advised of right to appeal within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 05/28/2019. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, ) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 05/28/2019. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roberto Chavez, C. Hutton, and Larry Volz, filed by Sundari K. Prasad. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.