Petruzzi et al v. Capital One Financial Corp. et al
Karen Petruzzi and Kathy Packett |
Capital One Financial Corp., Capital One, National Association and Capital One Financial Corporation |
3:2019cv00443 |
June 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Henry E Hudson |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION for Default Judgment as to by Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One, National Association. (Satterwhite, Rodney) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One, National Association. (Satterwhite, Rodney) |
Filing 11 Memorandum in Support re #10 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint filed by Kathy Packett, Karen Petruzzi. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Proposed Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit Proposed Exhibit 1 to Amended Complaint, #4 Exhibit Proposed Exhibit 2 to Amended Complaint)(Curwood, Craig) (Attachment 3 replaced with redacted version on 8/1/2019) (jsau, ). (Attachment 4 replaced with redacted version on 8/1/2019) (jsau, ). |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Kathy Packett, Karen Petruzzi. (Curwood, Craig) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Igor Mikhaylovich Babichenko on behalf of Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One, National Association (Babichenko, Igor) |
Filing 8 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One, National Association. (Satterwhite, Rodney) |
Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Kathy Packett, Karen Petruzzi by Capital One, National Association, Capital One Financial Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Satterwhite, Rodney) (Attachment 1 replaced with redacted version on 8/1/2019) (jsau, ). (Attachment 2 replaced with redacted version on 8/1/2019) (jsau, ). |
Filing 6 Memorandum in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One, National Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Satterwhite, Rodney) (Attachment 1 replaced with redacted version on 8/1/2019) (jsau, ). (Attachment 2 replaced with redacted version on 8/1/2019) (jsau, ). |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One, National Association. (Satterwhite, Rodney) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Karen Petruzzi, Kathy Packett Capital One Financial Corporation served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019; Capital One, National Association served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019 (Curwood, Craig) |
Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to Capital One Financial Corporation, Capital One, National Association. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Remove header and print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (tjoh, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (tjoh, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Kathy Packett, Karen Petruzzi. (Curwood, Craig) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6692484.), filed by Karen Petruzzi, Kathy Packett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Curwood, Craig) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/17/2019) (tjoh, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.