Baber v. Ray et al
| Matthew Lee Baber |
| Harold Clarke and Tracy Ray |
| 3:2019cv00491 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Roderick C Young |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Should Petitioner desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within 30 days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 8/28/2019. Copy to Petitioner as directed. (jsmi, )
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 8/28/2019. Copy to Petitioner as directed. (jsmi, ) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Matthew Lee Baber. (jsmi, ) |
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER that petition is CONDITIONALLY FILED; Clerk directed to process Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; if not previously submitted, failure of Petitioner to return completed in forma pauperis affidavit within 15 days will result in dismissal of action. See Order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roderick C. Young on 8/2/2019. Copy of Order to Petitioner as directed with IFP form. (jsmi, )
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Matthew Lee Baber. (jsmi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
