Littlestone, LC et al v. Robert J. Chauvin, et al.
Littlestone, LC and Chadwick Development LLC |
Chauvin, LLC, Robert J Chavin and Robert J. Chauvin |
3:2019cv00514 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 RESPONSE in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , #7 First MOTION to Remand filed by Chadwick Development LLC, Littlestone, LC. (Robbins, C.) |
Filing 14 Opposition to #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Robert J. Chauvin, Chauvin, LLC. (Gavin, Charles) |
![]() |
Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File Late Response by Robert J. Chauvin, Chauvin, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order)(Gavin, Charles) |
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 First MOTION to Dismiss 12 (b)(6), #6 Memorandum in Support by Chadwick Development LLC, Littlestone, LC. (Robbins, C.) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) by Chadwick Development LLC, Littlestone, LC. (Robbins, C.). Modified docket entry on 08/02/2019. (walk, ). |
Notice of Correction re: Document #7 ; the filing user is notified that the document includes two motions and is requested to refile the same document using the filing event, Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction. The docket text for Document #8 will be modified after the Motion to Dismiss has been filed. (walk, ) |
Filing 8 Memorandum in Support re: #7 MOTION to Remand PURSUANT TO 28 USC 1447 and #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) filed by Chadwick Development LLC, Littlestone, LC. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit). (Robbins, C.). Modified docket entry on 08/02/2019. (walk, ). |
Filing 7 MOTION to Remand PURSUANT TO 28 USC 1447 by Chadwick Development LLC, Littlestone, LC. (Robbins, C.) Modified docket entry on 08/02/2019. (walk, ). |
Filing 6 Memorandum in Support re #5 First MOTION to Dismiss 12 (b)(6) filed by Robert J. Chauvin. (Gavin, Charles) |
Filing 5 First MOTION to Dismiss 12 (b)(6) by Robert J. Chauvin. (Gavin, Charles) |
Filing 4 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint by Chauvin, LLC and by Robert J. Chauvin.(Gavin, Charles) |
Filing 3 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Chauvin, LLC. (walk, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (walk, ) |
Notice of Correction re: Document #2 ; the filing user is reminded to file the Financial Interest Disclosure Statement separately when filing a new case. The filing event, Financial Disclosure Statement, is located under Other Documents. The document has been filed and no further action is required at this time. (walk, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Arthur Gavin on behalf of Robert J. Chauvin and Chauvin, LLC. (Attachment: #1 Financial Disclosure). (Gavin, Charles). Modified docket entry on 07/16/2019 and regenerated NEF. (walk, ). |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal filed by Robert J. Chauvin, Jr. and Chauvin, LLC. Case removed from the Amelia Circuit Court, Case No. CL19-241-00. (Filing Fee Paid: $400.00, Receipt Number: 0422-6739277). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet). (Gavin, Charles). Modified docket entry on 07/16/2019 and regenerated NEF. (walk, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.