Santos v. Contract Callers, Inc. et al
Raymond A Santos |
National Credit Systems, Inc. and Contract Callers, Inc. |
3:2019cv00527 |
July 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Raymond A Santos. (Vance, Ian) |
Filing 17 Decline Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by National Credit Systems, Inc.. (Dillard, Walter) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Katrina Marie DeMarte for National Credit Systems, Inc. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 09/12/2019. (tjoh, ) |
Filing 15 NOTICE by Contract Callers, Inc. re #12 Order, Statement Regarding Magistrate Judge (Canter, Bradley) |
Filing 14 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Katrina Marie DeMarte and Certification of Local Counsel Walter Scott Dillard II Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6831498. by National Credit Systems, Inc.. (Dillard, Walter) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Ian Edward Vance on behalf of Raymond A Santos (Vance, Ian) |
Filing 12 ORDER that counsel shall confer with their respective clients and with each other to determine whether all parties will consent to assignment of the case to a Magistrate Judge as the presiding judicial officer. See 28 U.S.C. 636. To that end, counsel for the defendant shall ensure that the foregoing conferences occur not later than SEPTEMBER 12, 2019, and that the Court is informed not later than 5:00 p.m. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 8/29/19. (khan, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 8/29/19. (khan, ) |
Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/24/2019 at 11:15 AM in Richmond Courtroom 6100 before District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (khan, ) |
Filing 10 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Contract Callers, Inc.. (Canter, Bradley) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Contract Callers, Inc..(Canter, Bradley) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by National Credit Systems, Inc..(Dillard, Walter) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by National Credit Systems, Inc.. (Dillard, Walter) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Walter Scott Dillard, II on behalf of National Credit Systems, Inc. (Dillard, Walter) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Raymond A Santos National Credit Systems, Inc. served on 7/29/2019, answer due 8/19/2019 (Sarrett, Drew) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Raymond A Santos Contract Callers, Inc. served on 7/29/2019, answer due 8/19/2019 (Sarrett, Drew) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Contract Callers, Inc., National Credit Systems, Inc.. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 summons 2)(tjoh, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (tjoh, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint as to Contract Callers, Inc. and National Credit Systems, Inc. by Raymond A Santos. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to National Credit Systems, Inc.)(Sarrett, Drew) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6754035.), filed by Raymond A Santos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sarrett, Drew) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/24/2019) (tjoh, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.