Cotman v. Kamras et al
| Chireda Cotman |
| Jason Kamras and City of Richmond School Board |
| 3:2019cv00545 |
| July 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert E Payne |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to City of Richmond School Board waiver sent on 8/20/2019, answer due 10/21/2019. (Hawkins, Richard) Modified docket text on 9/10/2019 (smej, ). |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Jason Kamras waiver sent on 8/20/2019, answer due 10/21/2019. (Hawkins, Richard) Modified docket text on 9/10/2019 (smej, ). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to City of Richmond School Board, Jason Kamras. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: REMOVE HEADERS and print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (smej, ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons for Jason Kamras by Chireda Cotman. (Hawkins, Richard) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons for City of Richmond Public Schools by Chireda Cotman. (Hawkins, Richard) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (smej, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $400, Receipt Number: 0422-6764949), filed by Chireda Cotman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hawkins, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
