Mullins v. Harco National Insurance Co.
leonard mullins |
Harco National Insurance Co. and Harco National Insurance Company |
3:2019cv00573 |
August 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Harco National Insurance Company. (Garrett, Thomas) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Harco National Insurance Company (Garrett, Thomas). Modified docket text on 9/25/2019 (sbea, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leonard Mullins Harco National Insurance Company served on 9/4/2019, answer due 9/25/2019 (Peritz, Marc) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Harco National Insurance Company. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: REMOVE HEADERS and print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (smej, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons to Harco National Insurance Company by Leonard Mullins. (Peritz, Marc) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (tjoh, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6782862.), filed by leonard mullins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Peritz, Marc) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/12/2019) (tjoh, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.