Toms v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
Richard Toms |
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated |
3:2019cv00679 |
September 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Henry E Hudson |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Letter from Clerk to Plaintiff's counsel regarding local rule 83.1. (jsau, ) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated. (Busman, Philip) |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL. IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The #9 Motion is GRANTED. 2. Richard B. North, Jr. of the law firm of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel for Defendants. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 9/20/19. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 9/20/19. (jsau, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Richard B. North by Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Busman, Philip) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip M. Busman on behalf of Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated (Busman, Philip) |
Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Arizona; Case Number 2:16-cv-01632. Original file and docket sheet received. |
Remark: Transferring Case to the Eastern District of Virginia via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 9/17/2019.] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED SCHEDULES FOR CASES TO BE TRANSFERRED OR REMANDED Re: #5 . Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 8/26/19.(MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 9/17/2019.] |
Filing 5 SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER. See Document for Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 8/19/19. (SLQ) [Transferred from Arizona on 9/17/2019.] |
Filing 4 ORDER pursuant to General Order 09-08 granting #2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Counsel is advised that they are limited to two (2) additional e-mail addresses in their District of Arizona User Account. (BAS) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) [Transferred from Arizona on 9/17/2019.] |
PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 35, receipt number PHX172395 as to J Christopher Elliott. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) [Transferred from Arizona on 9/17/2019.] |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G. Campbell, with member case number: CV-16-1632-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 9/17/2019.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney J Christopher Elliott on behalf of Richard Toms. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 9/17/2019.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number PHX172392 filed by Richard Toms. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 9/17/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.