Barlow v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Loretta Barlow
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 3:2019cv00743
Filed: October 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (please see Standing Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 07/20/2018. (walk, )
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (please see Revised Standing Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2013. (walk, )
October 28, 2019 Filing 4 Certificate Reporting Service by Nancy A. Berryhill. Nancy A. Berryhill served on 10/24/2019, Answer due 12/23/2019. (walk, )
October 11, 2019 Filing 3 Summonses Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia General. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: To access the summonses, click on the document number and input your CM/ECF username and password (your PACER username and password will not open the document.) Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for SSA, AG & USAO. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon the SSA, AG and USAO. Please ask your process server to return the service copies (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file them using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (walk, )
October 11, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons all 3 summonses by Loretta Barlow. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Gillikin, Robert)
October 11, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint filed by Loretta Barlow against Nancy A. Berryhill. (Filing Fee Paid: $400.00, Receipt Number: 0422-6883262.). Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Gillikin, Robert). Modified docket entry on 10/11/2019 and regenerated NEF. (walk, ).
October 11, 2019 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (walk, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barlow v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Loretta Barlow
Represented By: Robert Wayne Gillikin, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Elizabeth Catherine Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?