Tibbs v. Saul et al
Plaintiff: Jeffrey R. Tibbs
Defendant: Andrew Saul and SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 3:2019cv00752
Filed: October 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Henry E Hudson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to SSA (Social Security Administration), U.S. Attorney General, and the U.S. Attorney. (sbea, )
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Novak on 7/20/2018. (sbea, )
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2013. (sbea, )
November 1, 2019 Filing 6 Certificate Reporting Service; SSA (Social Security Administration) served on 10/23/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (sbea, )
October 21, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to SSA (Social Security Administration), U.S. Attorney General, and the U.S. Attorney. Clerk placed Summons and Complaint in U.S. Marshals box for service. (sbea, )
October 18, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Jeffrey R. Tibbs. (sbea, )
October 18, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT for Review of a Social Security Disability or Supplemental Security Income Decision filed by Jeffrey R. Tibbs. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification, #2 Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Civil Cover Sheet). (sbea, )
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER that Plaintiff's #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) on October 15, 2019, is GRANTED. Plaintiff may proceed in this case without paying the Court's filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process and deliver the summons to the United States Marshal for service. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Novak on 10/18/2019. Order was mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (sbea, )
October 15, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jeffrey R. Tibbs. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Local Rule 83.1(M) Certification, #3 Notice of Appeals Council Action, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 E-Noticing Registration Request, #6 Proposed Summons). (sbea, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tibbs v. Saul et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey R. Tibbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Elizabeth Catherine Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?