T.M. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomasia Dupreah Mack and T. M. |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
3:2019cv00768 |
October 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John A Gibney |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Notice of Correction re: #3 Proposed Summons, #1 Complaint, #2 Amended Complaint. Filing attorney notified that pursuant to Local Rule 5.2(a)(3), the name of an individual known to be a minor may only include the minor's initials. Attorney shall send the Clerk a redacted copy of all documents filed by email to be replaced. Clerk has corrected the style of the case. (jsau, ) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #2 Amended Complaint by T.M. (Maury, Robert) Modified docket text on 12/13/2019 (jsau, ). |
Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed by T.M. (Maury, Robert) Modified docket text on 12/13/2019 (jsau, ). |
Notice of Correction: Filing attorney notified to electronically file proposed summons for service of process. (jsmi, ) |
Case assigned to District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6895309.), filed by T.M. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maury, Robert) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/21/2019) (jsmi, ). Modified on 12/13/2019 (jsau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.