Rawls-Dolin v. Drummond
Plaintiff: Christina Rawls-Dolin
Defendant: Greer Q. Drummond
Case Number: 3:2019cv00776
Filed: October 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINAL ORDER - Because both federal question and diversity jurisdiction are lacking, the Court will DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Rawls-Dolin's Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) and 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Should Rawls-Dolin wish to appeal this Order, written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/06/2019. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, )
November 1, 2019 Filing 6 Response to #3 Order, filed by Christina Rawls-Dolin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tjoh, )
October 25, 2019 Notice of Correction re #5 Notice of Appearance. The filing user has been notified to file future documents with the correct signature block (tjoh, )
October 24, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William Woodul Tunner on behalf of Greer Q. Drummond (Tunner, William)
October 23, 2019 Filing 4 COMPLAINT (PROVISIONALLY FILED) against Greer Q. Drummond, filed by Christina Rawls-Dolin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certification)(tjoh, )
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER provisionally granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court ORDERS that the Clerk provisionally file the proffered Complaint; and it is further ORDERED that, no later than November 15,2019, Rawls-Dolin shall file an Amended Complaint, which outlines in simple and straightforward terms why she thinks that she is entitled to relief and why the Court has jurisdiction over her case. Rawls-Dolin is ADVISED that, if she does not satisfy this requirement, the provisional grant of relief to proceed in forma pauperis will be withdrawn and the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis will be denied. The failure to strictly comply with the Court's directives and with applicable rules will result in DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 10/23/2019. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (tjoh, )
October 22, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Christina Rawls-Dolin. (tjoh, )
October 22, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christina Rawls-Dolin. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Letter, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Certification, #5 Envelope, #6 Notice of Leave to File & Receive Electronic Documents, #7 Proposed Summons)(tjoh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rawls-Dolin v. Drummond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Rawls-Dolin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greer Q. Drummond
Represented By: William Woodul Tunner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?