Jones v. Seiling et al
| W. David Jones |
| Natalie C. Seiling, John T. Wait and United States of America |
| 3:2019cv00894 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Granting Government's Motion of Substitution). THIS MATTER is before the Court on the United States Government's ("Government") Motion of Substitution as Proper Party Defendant (the "Motion"), filed on December 4, 2019 #2 . For the reasons stated herein, the Government will be fully substituted for Defendant Wait, and will be partially substituted for Defendant Seiling, as a party Defendant. Further, there is currently pending an unopposed Motion to Dismiss, filed by the Government on December 6, 2019 #3 . At the hearing, Plaintiff requested fourteen (14) days from the hearing to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, Plaintiff has until February 5, 2020, to file his response, and the Government has until February 11, 2020, to file any reply. See Order for details. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 1/23/20. (jsau, )
|
| Filing 8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (Court Reporter Harding, OCR): Motion Hearing held on 1/22/2020 re #2 Motion (Notice) to Substitute United States of America as Proper Party Defendant filed by Natalie C. Seiling and John T. Wait. Argument heard; motion granted. Plaintiff to file a response to defendants' Motion to Dismiss two weeks from today; defendants' reply due six days thereafter. (rpiz) |
| Set Hearings in case as to #2 Notice to Substitute Party: Motion Hearing set for 1/22/2020 at 11:00 AM in Richmond Courtroom 7000 before District Judge Henry E. Hudson (rpiz) |
| Filing 7 Response to #5 Objection to Certification and Substitution of US filed by Natalie C. Seiling, John T. Wait. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint), #2 Exhibit B (Amended Complaint), #3 Exhibit C (USA Certification))(Wu, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 Memorandum in Support of #6 Objection To #2 Substitution and Certification Filed By The United States of America filed by W. David Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Part 1, #2 Exhibit 1, Part 2, #3 Exhibit 2, Part 1, #4 Exhibit 2, Part 2, #5 Exhibit 3)(Brooks, Thomas) Modified docket text on 12/19/2019 (jsau, ). |
| Filing 5 Objection To #2 Substitution and Certification Filed By The United States of America filed by W. David Jones. (Brooks, Thomas) Modified docket text on 12/19/2019 (jsau, ). |
| Filing 4 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Natalie C. Seiling, John T. Wait. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1--DLA Declaration)(Wu, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Natalie C. Seiling, John T. Wait. (Wu, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE (Motion) of Substitution of the United States of America as Proper Party Defendant and brief in support by Natalie C. Seiling and John T. Wait (Wu, Elizabeth) (modified on 1/8/2020 to change event to a pending motion - rpiz) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal , filed by John T Wait, Natalie C Seiling. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A--Complaint, #2 Exhibit B--proposed Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C--Certification, #4 Exhibit D--Seiling Answer and Counterclaim)(Wu, Elizabeth) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (jsau, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
