Hughes et al v. Henrico County Public Schools, et al.
| Quentin Johnson and Robin Hughes |
| Thomas McAuley, John Doe, Scott Bowers and Henrico County Public Schools |
| 3:2019cv00905 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Memorandum in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Robin Hughes, Quentin Johnson. (Krudys, Mark) |
| Filing 14 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Scott Bowers, Henrico County Public Schools, Thomas McAuley. (Gilbody, John) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Scott Bowers, Henrico County Public Schools, Thomas McAuley. (Gilbody, John) |
Filing 12
SO ORDERED - Henrico County and McAuley "ask this Court to extend the time for filing their response by ten days-w1til January 17, 2020." (Mot. 1, ECF No. 10). Henrico County and McAuley request the extension in order to better respond to several new counts "alleged in the Amended Complaint." (Id.) Henrico County and McAuley further represent that "counsel for the Plaintiff offered the extension because of the holiday." (Id. 2.) For good cause shown, and based on the parties' agreement, the Court GRANTS the Motion #10 . Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 1/2/2020. (smej, )
|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robin Hughes, Quentin Johnson Scott Bowers served on 12/30/2019, answer due 1/21/2020 (Krudys, Mark) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Henrico County Public Schools, Thomas McAuley. (Murphy, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Scott Bowers. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (smej, ) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons re #7 Amended Complaint for Defendant Scott Bowers by Robin Hughes, Quentin Johnson. (Krudys, Mark) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Robin Hughes, Quentin Johnson.(Hodges, Charlotte) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Guinnane Zemel on behalf of Robin Hughes, Quentin Johnson (Zemel, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark J. Krudys on behalf of Robin Hughes, Quentin Johnson (Krudys, Mark) |
| Filing 4 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Henrico County Public Schools, Thomas McAuley. (Gilbody, John) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Henrico County Public Schools, Thomas McAuley. (Gilbody, John) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Removal (Filing Fee: $400, Receipt Number: 0422-6971284), filed by Thomas McAuley, Henrico County Public Schools (Henrico County School Board). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit Summonses, #4 Exhibit Demurrer and Special Plea) (Murphy, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet by Henrico County Public Schools (Henrico County School Board), Thomas McAuley. (Murphy, Ryan) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (smej, ) |
| Electronic Fee Payment - by Henrico County Public Schools (Henrico County School Board), Thomas McAuley. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6971210.. (Murphy, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
