Foxx v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
| Jonathan B. Foxx |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00017 |
| January 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert E Payne |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Kelsey Haught Parsons for United Parcel Service, Inc. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 03/02/2020. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Charles M Roesch for United Parcel Service, Inc. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 03/02/2020. (tjoh, )
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Johannsen, August) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by United Parcel Service, Inc..(Johannsen, August) |
| Filing 7 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Kelsey Haught Parsons and Certification of Local Counsel August T. Johannsen Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7085283. by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Johannsen, August) |
| Filing 6 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Charles Matthew Roesch and Certification of Local Counsel August T. Johannsen Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7085195. by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Johannsen, August) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jonathan B. Foxx United Parcel Service, Inc. served on 2/5/2020, answer due 2/26/2020 (Brown, Carla) (Main Document 5 replaced on 2/5/2020) (tjoh, ). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United Parcel Service, Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Remove header and print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (tjoh, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (tjoh, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Jonathan B. Foxx re #1 Complaint (Notice of Filing Corrected Civil Cover Sheet) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Carla) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Jonathan B. Foxx. (Brown, Carla) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7016864.), filed by Jonathan B. Foxx. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Carla) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/10/2020) (tjoh, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Foxx v. United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | August Tyler Johannsen |
| Represented By: | Charles M Roesch |
| Represented By: | Kelsey Haught Parsons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonathan B. Foxx | |
| Represented By: | Carla Denette Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
