Prasad v. City of Hampton et al
| Sundari K. Prasad |
| Sgt. L. Jones, City of Hampton and Lt. Col Walz |
| 3:2020cv00025 |
| January 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Roderick C Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER - It is ORDERED that: Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and, if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, she may submit a new complaint with the full $400 filing fee. The Court will process such a complaint as a new civil action. Should Plaintiff desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 2/28/2020. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, )
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 2/28/2020. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, ) |
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT against City of Hampton, L. Jones, Col Walz, filed by Sundari K. Prasad. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope) (smej, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Hampton, L. Jones, Col Walz, filed by Sundari K. Prasad. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
