Oakes v. Saul
| Suzanne Oakes |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 3:2020cv00061 |
| February 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert E Payne |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General **NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ask your process server to return the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (sbea, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint for service upon Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of SSA, William Barr, U.S. Attorney General and G. Zachary Terwilliger, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia by Suzanne Oakes. (Billman, Bruce) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Judicial Review (Filing Fee: $400, Receipt Number: 0422-7054418), filed by Suzanne Oakes. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Billman, Bruce). Modified on 2/3/2020 (sbea, ). |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (sbea, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
