Davis v. Unknown
| Darlene Denise Davis |
| Unknown |
| USBC-Richmond (United States Bankruptcy Court) |
| 3:2020cv00205 |
| March 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Bankruptcy Transmittal Cover Sheet with Designation of Record. (Attachments: #1 Designation of Record) (smej, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Accordingly, no later than Friday, May 15, 2020, Davis shall remit the filing fee as required by Rule 8003, file a motion to proceed informa pauperis, or show cause for why she has not paid the fee. The Court cautions Davis that failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of her appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send this Order and a copy of the informa pauperis affidavit to Davis at her address of record. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 4/3/2020. (smej, )
|
| Filing 2 Letter from Clerk re: Rule 8018. Letter along with attachment was mailed to pro se plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Bankruptcy Rule 8018) (smej, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 19-36077-KLP, filed by Darlene Denise Davis. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal 1 - Prior to Order Entered, #2 Appeal 2 - After Order Entered) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
