Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Michelle L. Wright
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 3:2020cv00210
Filed: March 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert E Payne
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2051
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2020 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM Forms, #2 USPS Tracking Information) (smej, )
April 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 7/20/2018. (smej, )
April 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2013. (smej, )
April 6, 2020 Filing 6 Certificate Reporting Service as to Commissioner of Social Security served on 4/1/2020, answer due 6/1/2020. (smej, )
March 30, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Clerk placed in USM box for service. (Attachments: #1 USM Forms) (smej, )
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - Upon due consideration, Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis #3 filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) on March 27, 2020, is GRANTED. Plaintiff may proceed in this case without paying the Courts filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process and deliver the summons to the United States Marshal for service. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 3/30/2020. (smej, )
March 27, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michelle L. Wright. (smej, )
March 27, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Michelle L. Wright. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons - US Attorney, #2 Exhibit Summons - Regional Counsel)(Farrell, Clifford) (Attachment 1 replaced with correct address on 3/30/2020) (smej, ). Modified on 3/30/2020 (smej, ).
March 27, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint , filed by Michelle L. Wright. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit In Forma Pauperis)(Farrell, Clifford)
March 27, 2020 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (smej, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle L. Wright
Represented By: Clifford Michael Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?