Stevens v. Bennett
Petitioner: Emerson Eugene Stevens
Respondent: Adrianne Bennett
Case Number: 3:2020cv00352
Filed: May 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2020 Filing 1 Second PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0422-7208493.), filed by Emerson Eugene Stevens. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Part 1 of 3, #2 Appendix Part 2 of 3, #3 Appendix Part 3 of 3)(Givens, Jennifer) (Main Document 1 replaced on 5/18/2020) (jsmi, ).
May 18, 2020 Case assigned to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (jsmi, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stevens v. Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Emerson Eugene Stevens
Represented By: Jennifer Leigh Givens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Adrianne Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?