Anthony v. Saul
Smith W. Anthony |
Andrew Saul |
SSA (Social Security Administration) |
3:2020cv00361 |
May 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER - Effective immediately, if all parties in a Social Security Appeal consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the matter shall be reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes for all purposes. If the parties do not consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge, the case shall be referred to Judge Hanes for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 06/19/2020. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Smith W. Anthony. (Hunter, Horace) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7211744.), filed by Smith W. Anthony. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hunter, Horace) (Main Document 1 replaced on 5/20/2020) (jsmi, ). |
Case assigned to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (jsmi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.