Blackwood et al v. Does, 1-X
| Megan Blackwood, Keenan Angel, Jarrod Blackwood, Ryan Tagg and Christopher Gayler |
| John/Jane Does, 1-X |
| 3:2020cv00444 |
| June 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Video Disc ("Video Files") re: Document #1 , Exhibits 1-10 by Keenan Angel, Jarrod Blackwood, Megan Blackwood, Christopher Gayler and Ryan Tagg RECEIVED and LODGED in the Clerk's Office in a brown redwell expandable. (walk, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint filed by Christopher Gayler, Jarrod Blackwood, Ryan Tagg, Megan Blackwood and Keenan Angel against John/Jane Does, 1-X. (Filing Fee Paid: $400.00, Receipt Number: 0422-7251001). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 to 10, #3 Exhibit 11, #4 Exhibit 12 and #5 Exhibit 13). (Bodoh, Andrew). Modified docket entry on 06/16/2020 and regenerated NEF. (walk, ). |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (walk, ) |
| Notice to Counsel for Plaintiffs: The filing user is requested to submit the proposed summonses using the filing event, Proposed Summons or, to notify the Clerk's Office by letter, using the filing event, Letter, if Plaintiff intends to send a Waiver of Service of Summons to the Defendant(s). (walk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
