Jacob v. Saul
Tracey Hoover Jacob |
Andrew M. Saul |
SSA (Social Security Administration) |
3:2020cv00564 |
July 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
M Hannah Lauck |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Marshal's Return on Executed Summons as to Andrew M. Saul. (walk, ) |
Filing 12 Marshal's Return on Executed Summons issued to Andrew M. Saul, Social Security Administrator. (walk, ) |
Filing 11 Mail Addressed to Tracey Hoover Jacob Returned as Undeliverable re: #7 , #8 & #9 Standing Orders. The Clerk's Office corrected Plaintiff's street address in CM/ECF and remailed the #7 , #8 & #9 Standing Orders on 08/11/2020. (walk, ) |
Filing 10 Marshal's Return on Executed Summons issued to G. Zachary Terwilliger, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. (walk, ) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER. Effective immediately, if all parties in a Social Security Appeal consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the matter shall be reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes for all purposes. If the parties do not consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge, the case shall be referred to Judge Hanes for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). And it is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 06/19/2020. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, ) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (please see Standing Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Novak on 07/20/2018. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, ) |
Filing 7 REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (please see Revised Standing Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, ) |
Filing 6 Certificate Reporting Service by Andrew M. Saul. Andrew M. Saul served on 7/30/2020, answer due 9/28/2020. (Hambrick, Jonathan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Holland Hambrick on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Hambrick, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 Summonses Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; forwarded to USMS with USM-285 forms. (walk, ) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Tracey Hoover Jacob against Andrew M. Saul; filed pursuant to the Court's #2 Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Letter, #7 Local Civil Rule 83.1(M) Certification Form and #8 Envelope). (walk, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER that upon due consideration, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) on July 23, 2020, is GRANTED. Plaintiff may proceed in this case without paying the Court's filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process and deliver the summons to the United States Marshal for service. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 07/28/2020. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, ) |
Filing 1 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Tracey Hoover Jacob. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Letter, #8 Envelope and #9 Local Civil Rule 83.1(M) Certification Form). (walk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.