Dandridge v. Saul
| Angela R. Dandridge |
| Andrew Saul |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 3:2020cv00566 |
| July 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| David J Novak |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2051 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Position Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Defendant shall file his position on consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction not later than the deadline for filing his motion for summary judgment. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 9/9/2020. (cgar)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Position Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction by SSA (Social Security Administration), Andrew Saul. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lucier, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE by Angela R. Dandridge (Farrell, Clifford)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER - The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to file within seven (7) calendar days and Defendant to file within the later of seven (7) calendar days of the issuance of this Order or seven (7) calendar days of service of process a position on whether each party will consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Should both parties file a position consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction, consistent with the Court's Standing Orders for Social Security appeals, the Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk to reassign this case to United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes for all purposes. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 08/31/2020. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing 11
SUMMONSES Returned Executed as to USA.(tjoh, )
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 07/20/2018. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing 9
REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2013. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing 8
Certificate Reporting Service by SSA (Social Security Administration), Andrew Saul. SSA (Social Security Administration) served on 7/28/2020, answer due 9/28/2020; Andrew Saul served on 7/28/2020, answer due 9/28/2020. (Lucier, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Tyler Lucier on behalf of SSA (Social Security Administration), Andrew Saul (Lucier, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 06/19/2020. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing 5
Summonses Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and sent to USM for service. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may proceed in this case without paying the Courts filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process and deliver the summons to the United States Marshal for service. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 07/28/2020. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Angela R. Dandridge. (smej, )
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons by Angela R. Dandridge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons - US Attorney, #2 Exhibit Summons - Regional Counsel)(Farrell, Clifford)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint , filed by Angela R. Dandridge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Errata In Forma Pauperis)(Farrell, Clifford)
|
|
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge David J. Novak. (smej, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
