Rego v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Aungelika Rego |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 3:2020cv00643 |
| August 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Marshal's Return on Executed Summonses as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. (walk, ) |
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER. Effective immediately, if all parties in a Social Security Appeal consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the matter shall be reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes for all purposes. If the parties do not consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge, the case shall be referred to Judge Hanes for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). And it is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 06/19/2020. (walk, )
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (please see Standing Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 07/20/2018. (walk, )
|
|
Filing 9
REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (please see Revised Standing Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2013. (walk, )
|
| Filing 8 Certificate Reporting Service by Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security served on 8/27/2020, answer due 10/26/2020. (Wu, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Catherine Wu on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Wu, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 Summonses Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; forwarded to USMS with USM-285 forms. (walk, ) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT filed by Aungelika Rego against Commissioner of Social Security; filed pursuant to the Court's #4 Order. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A). (walk, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER that upon due consideration, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) on August 19, 2020, is GRANTED. Plaintiff may proceed in this case without paying the Court's filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process and deliver the summons to the United States Marshal for service. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 08/21/2020. (walk, )
|
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (walk, ) |
| Filing 3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Melissa A. Palmer and Certification of Local Counsel John O. Goss. Filing Fee Paid: $ 75, Receipt Number: 0422-7358941 by Aungelika Rego. (Goss, John). Modified docket entry on 08/20/2020 and regenerated NEF. (walk, ). |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Aungelika Rego. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 USM-285 Forms, #4 USM-285 Forms, #5 USM-285 Form). (Goss, John) |
| Filing 1 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Aungelika Rego. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet and #3 Complaint). (walk, ). Modified docket entry on 08/20/2020 and regenerated NEF. (walk, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
