Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott v. Nexus Services, Inc. et al PLEASE FILE IN CASE 3:20cv718-HEH ONLY!
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott |
Nexus Services, Inc. and Libre By Nexus, Inc. |
3:2020cv00658 |
August 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Henry E Hudson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER that Defendants' #12 Second Motion for an Extension of Time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED. Defendants shall have until October 23, 2020, to file its responsive pleadings. Upon the filing of a responsive pleading, a scheduling order will be issued. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 10/13/2020. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott. (Longosz, Edward) |
Filing 12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Libre By Nexus, Inc., Nexus Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Williams, Mario) |
Filing 11 ORDER that the Court GRANTS Defendants' #10 Consent Motion for Extension of Time for Defendants to Answer Complaint, affording Defendants through October 9, 2020 to serve an answer or motion upon Plaintiff in response to its complaint. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 9/29/2020. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Libre By Nexus, Inc., Nexus Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Williams, Mario) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Mario Bernard Williams on behalf of Libre By Nexus, Inc., Nexus Services, Inc. (Williams, Mario) |
Set Deadlines: Libre By Nexus, Inc. answer due 9/29/2020; Nexus Services, Inc. answer due 9/29/2020. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Nexus Services, Inc. served on 9/8/2020, answer due 9/29/2020. (Longosz, Edward) Modified to correct docket text on 9/17/2020 (jsmi, ). |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Libre By Nexus, Inc. served on 9/8/2020, answer due 9/29/2020. (Longosz, Edward) Modified to correct docket text on 9/17/2020 (jsmi, ). |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Libre By Nexus, Inc., Nexus Services, Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Removed header and print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (tjoh, ) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons for Libre By Nexus, Inc. by Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott. (Longosz, Edward) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons for Nexus Services, Inc. by Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott. (Longosz, Edward) |
Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint: Filing attorney has been instructed to file proposed summons to serve defendants, or if waiving service, to notify the court in writing by electronically filing the notice. (smej, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (smej, ) |
Filing 3 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott. (Longosz, Edward) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward John Longosz, II on behalf of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott (Longosz, Edward) |
Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $400.00, Receipt Number: 0422-7364039), filed by Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Longosz, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.