Reid v. Leabeau et al
| James Lamont Reid |
| H. Reid, Leabeau, Poarch, Giles, Mayes, Armstrong, R. Nickelberry, Reedy, Bryant, Blackwell, Sanders, Trinity Service Group and B. Hudson |
| 3:2020cv00685 |
| September 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| David J Novak |
| Roderick C Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by James Lamont Reid. (smej, )
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER that this action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within 30 days of entry hereof; Clerk to obtain certified copy of Plaintiffs trust fund account for 6 month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; Plaintiff to return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. See Order for more details. Copies mailed: Yes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 10/09/2020. (tjoh, )
|
|
Filing 2
Documents received by James Lamont Reid. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smej, )
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner COMPLAINT against Armstrong, Blackwell, Bryant, Giles, B. Hudson, Leabeau, Mayes, R. Nickelberry, Poarch, Reedy, H. Reid, Sanders, Trinity Service Group, filed by James Lamont Reid. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope) (smej, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
