Bland v. Saul
Plaintiff: Jerome Bland
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 3:2020cv00704
Filed: September 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Marshal's Return on Executed Summonses as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. (walk, )
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER. Effective immediately, if all parties in a Social Security Appeal consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the matter shall be reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes for all purposes. If the parties do not consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge, the case shall be referred to Judge Hanes for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). And it is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 06/19/2020. (walk, )
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (please see Standing Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 07/20/2018. (walk, )
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (please see Revised Standing Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2013. (walk, )
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Certificate Reporting Service by SSA (Social Security Administration), Andrew M. Saul. SSA (Social Security Administration) served on 9/17/2020, answer due 11/16/2020. (Lucier, Jonathan). Modified docket entry on 10/15/2020. (walk, ).
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Tyler Lucier on behalf of SSA (Social Security Administration), Andrew M. Saul (Lucier, Jonathan)
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summonses Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; forwarded to USMS with USM-285 forms. (walk, )
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 COMPLAINT filed by Jerome Bland against Andrew M. Saul; filed pursuant to the Court's #4 Order. (walk, )
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that upon due consideration, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) on September 9, 2020, is GRANTED. Plaintiff may proceed in this case without paying the Court's filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process and deliver the summons to the United States Marshal for service. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 09/11/2020. (walk, )
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (sbea,)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Notice of Correction re: #1 Complaint #2 and #3 NOTICE; Clerk has notified the filing attorney of proper procedures for submitting an Initial Complaint. The attorney was requested to include the Civil Action Case Number on the referenced documents upon receipt before submitting to the Court. Attorney selected the wrong filing event for the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and the Proposed Summonses. The correct event is "Proceed In Forma Pauperis" and "Proposed Summons" and not that of "Notice". The Clerk has made the corrections and no further action is required at this time. (sbea,)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Proposed Summonses by Jerome Bland (Pollard, Corey). Clerk replaced Summonses to include Civil Action Number on 9/10/2020). Modified docket text on 9/10/2020. (sbea,)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Motion for In Forma Pauperis by Jerome Bland (Pollard, Corey). Clerk replaced In Forma Pauperis, Motion and Order to include Civil Action Number and also corrected the filing event on 9/10/2020. Modified docket text on 9/10/2020. (sbea,)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint filed by Jerome Bland. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pollard, Corey). Clerk replaced Complaint to include Civil Action Number on 9/10/2020. Modified docket text on 9/10/2020. (sbea,)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bland v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerome Bland
Represented By: Corey Reece Pollard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Jonathan Tyler Lucier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Represented By: Jonathan Tyler Lucier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?