Gaber v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sheryl L. Gaber
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 3:2020cv00708
Filed: September 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: David J Novak
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 Filing 8 Certificate Reporting Service by Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/17/2020, answer due 11/16/2020. (Wu, Elizabeth)
October 16, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Catherine Wu on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Wu, Elizabeth)
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that should both parties consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, consistent with the Court's Standing Orders for Social Security appeals, the Court hereby DIRECTS the Clerk to reassign this case to United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes for all purposes. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 9/15/2020. (jsmi, )
September 15, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Placed in USMS box for service of process. (Attachments: #1 USM-285 forms)(jsmi, )
September 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that Plaintiffs #3 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff may proceed in this case without paying the Courts filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process and deliver the summons to the United States Marshal for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 9/14/2020. (jsmi, )
September 11, 2020 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge David J. Novak. (asho, )
September 10, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sheryl L. Gaber. (asho, )
September 10, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Sheryl L. Gaber. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons - US Attorney, #2 Exhibit Summons - Regional Counsel)(Farrell, Clifford) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/11/2020: #3 Summons - Attorney General) (asho, ).
September 10, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint , filed by Sheryl L. Gaber. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit In Forma Pauperis)(Farrell, Clifford)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaber v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Elizabeth Catherine Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheryl L. Gaber
Represented By: Clifford Michael Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?