Hawthorne v. Pearson
| Derrick Jerome Hawthorne |
| Eddie L. Pearson |
| 3:2020cv00764 |
| September 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Ordering Payment of Filing Fee). Upon review of Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis, it is ORDERED that Petitioner's petition will be filed upon payment of the full filing fee of $5.00. Failure to pay the required fee or to file an explanation as outlined above within eleven (11) days of date of entry hereof will result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 11/18/20. (Copy mailed to plaintiff).(jtho, )
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Greensville Correctional Center. (tjoh, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Derrick Jerome Hawthorne. (tjoh, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/10/2020: #1 Envelope) (tjoh, ). |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Greensville Correctional Center as to Derrick Jerome Hawthorne. (walk, ) |
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Filing 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition) that Petitioner, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition. He also seeks leave to proceed without payment of the statutory filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) (requiring five dollar ($5.00) filing fee for all habeas petitions); 28 U.S.C. 1915 (permitting a court to approve in forma pauperis status for litigant). Upon initial consideration of the petition, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Petition is CONDITIONALLY FILED pending payment of any assessed filing fee; 2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to process Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis (please see Memorandum Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 10/27/2020. Copy mailed to Petitioner with IFP Application and a Notice & Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate form. Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement and Letter mailed to Greensville Correction Center. (walk, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION and Affidavit in Support to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Derrick Jerome Hawthorne. (walk, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed by Derrick Jerome Hawthorne.(walk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hawthorne v. Pearson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Eddie L. Pearson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Derrick Jerome Hawthorne | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
