Kapitus Servicing, Inc. v. Ninth Avenue Tomato, Inc., et al.
Kapitus Servicing, Inc. |
Ninth Avenue Tomato, Inc. D/B/A Bocca Di Bacco, Robert Malta and Ninth Avenue Tomato, Inc. doing business as Bocca di Bacco |
3:2020cv00834 |
October 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Robert E Payne |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Robert Malta and Ninth Avenue Tomato, Inc.. (walk, ) |
Notice of Correction re: Document #1 , the filing user is reminded not include an original signature with documents filed electronically. The filing user is also reminded to file the Financial Interest Disclosure Statement separately when opening a new civil action. The Financial Interest Disclosure Statement has been filed separately and no further action is required at this time. (walk, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (walk, ) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal filed by Robert Malta and Ninth Avenue Tomato, Inc.; Removed from the Hanover Circuit Court, Case No. CL20-2719. (Filing Fee Paid: $400.00, Receipt Number: 0422-7469823). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Complaint Exhibit, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement). (Schmidt, Mark). Modified docket entry on 10/29/2020 and regenerated NEF. (walk, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.