Daigle v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff: Amelia Daigle
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv00845
Filed: November 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Amelia Daigle (Marchiando, Craig)
November 25, 2020 Filing 12 Memorandum in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Jones, Maryia)
November 25, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Jones, Maryia)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SO ORDERED - ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL - It is hereby, ORDERED that Craig C. Marchiando, of Consumer Litigation Associates, P.C. be substituted as counsel for the Plaintiff in the above matter, and it is further, ORDERED that Matthew J. Erausquin is removed as counsel in this case. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 11/23/2020. (smej, )
November 20, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Amelia Daigle. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bennett, Leonard)
November 20, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Leonard Anthony Bennett on behalf of Amelia Daigle (Bennett, Leonard)
November 16, 2020 Filing 7 State Court Documents Received. (tjoh, )
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading. Midland Credit Management, Inc. Responsive pleading due 11/25/2020. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 11/16/2020. (tjoh, )
November 11, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Maryia Yrjeuna Jones on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Jones, Maryia)
November 11, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kendall Hamilton Tan on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Tan, Kendall)
November 11, 2020 Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jones, Maryia)
November 4, 2020 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Jones, Maryia)
November 4, 2020 Filing 1 Notice of Removal (Filing Fee: $400.00, Receipt Number 0422-7480477), filed by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Jones, Maryia)
November 4, 2020 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (smej, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daigle v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amelia Daigle
Represented By: Matthew James Erausquin
Represented By: Craig Carley Marchiando
Represented By: Leonard Anthony Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Represented By: Kendall Hamilton Tan
Represented By: Maryia Yrjeuna Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?