Chinchilla v. McCarthy et al
| Ricardo Chinchilla |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, The Honorable Christopher C. Miller, Honorable Ryan D. McCarthy and Kathleen S. Miller |
| 3:2020cv00871 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
STANDING ORDER. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 6/19/2020. (jsmi, )
|
|
Filing 16
STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 7/20/2018. (jsmi, )
|
|
Filing 15
REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2013. (jsmi, )
|
| Filing 14 Certificate Reporting Service by Christopher C. Miller, Kathleen S. Miller, Ryan D. McCarthy, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Christopher C. Miller served on 12/16/2020, answer due 2/16/2021; Kathleen S. Miller served on 12/16/2020, answer due 2/16/2021; Ryan D. McCarthy served on 12/16/2020, answer due 2/16/2021; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA served on 12/16/2020, answer due 2/16/2021. (Hambrick, Jonathan) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Holland Hambrick on behalf of Ryan D. McCarthy, Christopher C. Miller, Kathleen S. Miller, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Hambrick, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Tami Lynn Mitchell to appear as Pro hac vice for Ricardo Chinchilla. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 12/2/2020. (smej, )
|
| Filing 11 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Tami L. Mitchell and Certification of Local Counsel Arthur Pickett Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7520998. by Ricardo Chinchilla. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Pro Hac Vice Application)(Pickett, Arthur) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Arthur Pickett on behalf of Ricardo Chinchilla (Pickett, Arthur) |
| Electronic Fee Payment - by Ricardo Chinchilla. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7515529.. (Pickett, Arthur) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (jsmi, ) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons United States (United States Attorney) by Ricardo Chinchilla. (Pickett, Arthur) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons United States of America (Attorney General) by Ricardo Chinchilla. (Pickett, Arthur) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Ryan D. McCarthy, Christopher C. Miller, and Kathleen S. Miller. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (jsmi, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (jsmi, ) |
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus by Ricardo Chinchilla. (Pickett, Arthur) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons The Honorable Christopher C. Miller by Ricardo Chinchilla. (Pickett, Arthur) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons Kathleen S. Miller by Ricardo Chinchilla. (Pickett, Arthur) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons The Honorable Ryan D. McCarthy by Ricardo Chinchilla. (Pickett, Arthur) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus And DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (Filing fee $ 400.), filed by Ricardo Chinchilla. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1, #2 Appendix 2)(Pickett, Arthur) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
