Howlett v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Barbara Ann Howlett |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 3:2020cv00879 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert E Payne |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to the Commissioner of Social Security, the U.S. Attorney and the U.S. Attorney General. (sbea,) |
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER. See Order for details. And it is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 6/19/2020. (sbea,)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 7/20/2018. (sbea,)
|
|
Filing 9
REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2013. (sbea,)
|
| Filing 8 Certificate Reporting Service by SSA (Social Security Administration), Commissioner of Social Security. SSA (Social Security Administration) served on 12/3/2020, answer due 2/1/2021; Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/3/2020, answer due 2/1/2021. (Lucier, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Tyler Lucier on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security, SSA (Social Security Administration) (Lucier, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to the Commissioner of Social Security, the U.S. Attorney and the U.S. Attorney General. Summons along with the Complaint were placed in the U.S. Marshals box for service. (sbea,) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that upon due consideration, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) on November 17, 2020, is GRANTED. Plaintiff may proceed in this case without paying the Courts filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process and deliver the summons to the United States Marshal for service. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 11/18/2020. (sbea,)
|
| Notice of Correction re: #1 Complaint, #2 MOTION Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and #3 Proposed Summons; filing attorney was reminded to include the Civil Action Number to documents before submitting them to the Court. Clerk has added the Civil Action Number to the documents. No further action is required at this time. (sbea,) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (sbea,) |
| Filing 4 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Melissa A. Palmer and Certification of Local Counsel John O. Goss Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7501438. by Barbara Ann Howlett. (Goss, John) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons by Barbara Ann Howlett. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 USM-285 Forms, #4 USM-285 Forms, #5 USM-285 Form)(Goss, John) |
| Filing 2 MOTION Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Barbara Ann Howlett. (Goss, John). Clerk replaced Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs form to include Civil Action Number on 11/18/2020. Modified docket text on 11/18/2020. (sbea,) |
| Filing 1 Complaint filed by Barbara Ann Howlett. (Attachments: #1 A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goss, John). Clerk replaced Complaint to include Civil Acton Number on 11/18/2020). Modified docket text on 11/18/2020. (sbea,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
