Johnson v. Unknown et al
Plaintiff: Razell Johnson
Defendant: Unknown, 1, Nicole Carrington and Stacy Jones
Case Number: 3:2020cv00884
Filed: November 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth W Hanes
Referring Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2020 Filing 7 Mail Returned to Sender as to Razell Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Returned Memorandum Opinion and Order). (sbea,)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Plaintiff failed to keep the Court informed of his current address. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/16/2020. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
December 16, 2020 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/16/2020. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
December 14, 2020 Filing 4 Mail Returned "Moved", "Left No Address", "Unable to Forward" as to Razell Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Order and Complaint). (sbea,)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Directing Clerk to Mail 1983 Form) Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, has submitted three pages of a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form. The complaint is missing the first and last pages, a complete statement of his claims, and any request for relief. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a new copy of the form for filing a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint. The Clerk is DIRECTED to write the civil action number for the present action on the standardized form for filing a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint and to send the form to Plaintiff. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 12/03/2020. Copy of Memorandum Order and 1983 form mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
November 18, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Razell Johnson. (tjoh, )
November 18, 2020 Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Nicole Carrington, Stacy Jones, Unknown, 1, filed by Razell Johnson. (Note: Complaint is incomplete - Page 1 is missing). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tjoh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Unknown et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown, 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicole Carrington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stacy Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Razell Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?