Kapitus Servicing, Inc. v. Tucker Construction Group, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Kapitus Servicing, Inc.
Defendant: Tucker Construction Group, Inc., Wardaron Tucker, Jr. and Tucker Construction Group, Inc. doing business as Tucker Construction Group
Case Number: 3:2020cv00912
Filed: November 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert E Payne
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2021 Notice of Correction re: #10 Corporate Disclosure Statement; Filing attorney selected the wrong filing event. The correct event is "Financial Disclosure Statement". Clerk corrected docket text to reflect same. No further action is required at this time. (sbea,)
January 13, 2021 Filing 10 Financial Disclosure Statement by Wardaron Tucker, Jr, Tucker Construction Group, Inc. (Williamson, Andrew). Modified to correct docket text on 1/14/2021. (sbea,)
January 4, 2021 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Wardaron Tucker, Jr, Tucker Construction Group, Inc..(Williamson, Andrew)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that that the SECOND JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (ECF No. #6 ) is granted. It is further ORDERED that the defendants, Tucker Construction Group, Inc. and Wardaron Lorenzo Tucker, Jr., shall file their Answers and any other motions with respect to the Complaint by January 4, 2021. No further extensions shall be permitted. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/28/2020. (sbea,)
December 17, 2020 Filing 7 Waiver of Hearing on Joint Motion re: #6 JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Wardaron Tucker, Jr., Tucker Construction Group, Inc. (Williamson, Andrew). Modified docket text on 12/17/2020. (sbea,)
December 17, 2020 Filing 6 SECOND JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Wardaron Tucker, Jr., Tucker Construction Group, Inc. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order)(Williamson, Andrew). Modified docket text on 12/17/2020. (sbea,)
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that having considered the defendants' JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (ECF No. #3 ), and there being no objection by the plaintiff, it is hereby ORDERED that the JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (ECF No. #3 ) is granted with modification. It is further ORDERED that the defendants, Tucker Construction Group, Inc. and Wardaron Lorenzo Tucker, Jr., shall file their Answers and any other motions with respect to the Complaint by December 18, 2020. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/07/2020. (walk, )
December 3, 2020 Filing 4 Waiver of Hearing On Joint Motion (DOCKET ENTRY # 3) re: #3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint Notice of Waiver of Hearing by Wardaron Tucker, Jr, Tucker Construction Group, Inc. (Williamson, Andrew). Modified docket text on 12/4/2020. (sbea,)
December 3, 2020 Filing 3 JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Wardaron Tucker, Jr, Tucker Construction Group, Inc. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order)(Williamson, Andrew). Clerk replaced Proposed Order with corrected Order on 12/4/2020. NEF was regenerated. Modified docket text on 12/4/2020. (sbea,)
December 3, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Andrew Hennigan on behalf of Kapitus Servicing, Inc. (Hennigan, Timothy)
November 27, 2020 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (sbea,)
November 27, 2020 Filing 1 Notice of Removal (Filing Fee: $400, Receipt Number: 0422-7517061), filed by Wardaron Tucker, Jr, Tucker Construction Group, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Service, #3 Exhibit Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williamson, Andrew). Modified docket text on 11/30/2020. (sbea,)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kapitus Servicing, Inc. v. Tucker Construction Group, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tucker Construction Group, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew Michael Williamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wardaron Tucker, Jr.
Represented By: Andrew Michael Williamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tucker Construction Group, Inc. doing business as Tucker Construction Group
Represented By: Andrew Michael Williamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kapitus Servicing, Inc.
Represented By: Timothy Andrew Hennigan
Represented By: Nhon Hien Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?