Mereacre v. Barr et al
| Artur Mereacre |
| Chad Wolf, Tony Pham, Warden of ICA Farmville Immigration Detention Facility, William Barr and Matthew Munroe |
| 3:2020cv00922 |
| December 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John A Gibney |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Immigration Centers of America Farmville as to Artur Mereacre. (walk, ) |
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Filing 28 U.S.C. 2241 Petition and Requiring Petitioner to Complete the Standardized Form) - The petition is CONDITIONALLY FILED; Petitioner is DIRECTED to complete and return the form to the Court within eleven (11) days of the date of entry hereof. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Petitioner a Notice & Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate form. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 12/23/2020. (Copy of Memorandum Order, 2241 Form, IFP Form, & Notice and Consent Form mailed to Petitioner. Inmate Account Form and copy of Memorandum Order mailed to Plaintiff's Institution.) (smej, )
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Artur Mereacre. (Additional attachment added on 12/2/2020: #1 Receipt in the amount of $5.00). Modified docket text on 12/2/2020. (sbea,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
