Gray v. Call et al
Avery F. Gray, Jr. |
W. Jarrett, David Call and S. Gilbertson |
3:2020cv00937 |
December 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Elizabeth W Hanes |
Henry E Hudson |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER (Conditionally Docketing Action). It is ORDERED that: this action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within 30 days of entry hereof; Clerk to obtain certified copy of Plaintiffs trust fund account for 6-month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; Plaintiff must affirm his intention to pay the entire $350.00 filing fee; Plaintiff to return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. It is so ORDERED. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 1/14/2021. Copy of Memorandum Order mailed to Plaintiff with IFP Form and Consent to Collection of Fees. Inmate Account Form and copy of Memorandum Order mailed to Plaintiff's Institution.(asho, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Avery F. Gray, Jr. (tjoh, ) |
Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against David Call, S. Gilbertson, W. Jarrett, filed by Avery F. Gray, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tjoh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.