Reinmuth v. County of Henrico et al
Jon Reinmuth |
Alec Oughton, John Walls, Tom Labelle, W. Brandon Hinton, Virginia County of Henrico, County of Henrico Board of Supervisors and John Vithoulkas |
3:2021cv00029 |
January 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John A Gibney |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/7/2021 at 02:05 PM via Zoom.gov before District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 3/3/21. (wtuc) |
Filing 22 CONSENT ORDER. On February 18, 2021, Defendants, by counsel, moved this Court for an extension of time to file their Answer, which was filed on February 17, 2021. Upon the agreement of counsel and for good cause shown, it is hereby ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that: 1) Defendants are granted a one-day extension of time to file their Answer; and 2) The Answer filed on February 17, 2021 (ECF No. #18 ) is considered timely filed. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 2/22/2021. (sbea,) |
Filing 21 MOTION in Support of Request for Extension by W. Brandon Hinton, Tom Labelle, Alec Oughton, Virginia County of Henrico, John Vithoulkas, John Walls. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Lee). Modified docket text on 2/18/2021. (sbea,) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Denise Mary Letendre on behalf of County of Henrico Board of Supervisors, W. Brandon Hinton, Tom Labelle, Alec Oughton, Virginia County of Henrico, John Vithoulkas, John Walls (Letendre, Denise) |
Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint by W. Brandon Hinton, Tom Labelle, Alec Oughton, Virginia County of Henrico, John Vithoulkas, John Walls.(Anderson, Lee) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Lee Ann Anderson on behalf of W. Brandon Hinton, Tom Labelle, Alec Oughton, Virginia County of Henrico, John Vithoulkas, John Walls (Anderson, Lee) |
Notice of Correction re: #13 , #14 , #15 , #16 , and #17 Affidavit of Service; Clerk notified filing attorney that the wrong filing event was selected. The correct filing event is "Summons Returned Executed" which will generate an answer due dated for the named defendants. Clerk will set the answer due date as to all remaining defendants - 2/16/2021. Also, the attorney was notified for future Executed Summonses that if they are served on the same date they can be scanned into one docket entry. Modified docket text on 2/17/2021 (sbea,) |
Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on John Walls on 1/26/21, filed by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on John Vithoulkas on 1/26/21, filed by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Alec Oughton on 1/26/21, filed by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Tom LaBelle on 1/26/21, filed by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on W. Brandon Hinton on 1/26/21, filed by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on County of Henrico, Virginia on 1/26/21, filed by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 11 ORDER that On February 10, 2021, the plaintiff filed a #10 notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) as to one of the defendants in this case, the County of Henrico Board of Supervisors (the "Board"). The Court acknowledges this voluntary dismissal and DIRECTS the Clerk to terminate the Board as a defendant in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 2/11/2021. (sbea,) |
Filing 10 NOTICE by Jon Reinmuth Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Defendant Board of Supervisors Only (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to County of Henrico Board of Supervisors, W. Brandon Hinton, Tom Labelle, Alec Oughton, Virginia County of Henrico, John Vithoulkas, John Walls. **NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (sbea, ) |
Filing 8 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint John Walls by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 7 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint John A. Vithoulkas by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint Alec W. Oughton by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint Tom LaBelle by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint W. Brandon Hinton by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint County of Henrico Board of Supervisors by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint County of Henrico, Virginia by Jon Reinmuth. (Coffield, Timothy) |
Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $402, Receipt Number: 0422-7588449), filed by Jon Reinmuth. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coffield, Timothy). Modified docket text on 1/19/2021. (sbea,) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (sbea,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.