Harris v. Hess et al
| Ayana Harris |
| Ellen Marie Hess, Virginia Unemployment Commission, Ralph Northam, Brian Ball and Manju Ganeriwala |
| 3:2021cv00110 |
| February 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| David J Novak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER - The Court finds Plaintiff qualified to proceed in forma pauperis and, therefore, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. it is hereby ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a particularized amended complaint that outlines in simple and straightforward terms why Plaintiff thinks that she is entitled to relief and why the Court has jurisdiction over this case, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(1) and (2). Plaintiff is hereby ADVISED that, if she does not satisfy these requirements, the provisional grant of relief to proceed in forma pauper is will be withdrawn and the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis will be denied. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 2/26/2021. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (smej, )
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ayana Harris. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint) (smej, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
