Landry v. Saul
| Ronette Landry |
| Andrew Saul |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 3:2021cv00124 |
| March 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Marshal's Return on Summons issued to Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (walk, ) |
| Filing 12 Marshal's Return on Summonses issued to the U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. (walk, ) |
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER. Effective immediately, if all parties in a Social Security Appeal consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the matter shall be reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes for all purposes. If the parties do not consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge, the case shall be referred to Judge Hanes for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). And it is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 06/19/2020. (walk, )
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (please see Standing Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 07/20/2018. (walk, )
|
|
Filing 9
REVISED STANDING ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (please see Revised Standing Order for additional information.) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 10/17/2013. (walk, )
|
| Filing 8 Certificate Reporting Service by Andrew Saul. Andrew Saul served on 3/17/2021, answer due 5/17/2021. (Wu, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Catherine Wu on behalf of Andrew Saul (Wu, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 Declaration EAJA Retainer Agreement and Assignment by Ronette Landry. (Hunter, Horace) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 USMS Process Receipts). Summonses placed in USMS box for service of process.(asho, ) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Ronette Landry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tjoh, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) on March 1, 2021, is GRANTED. Plaintiff may proceed in this case without paying the Courts filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue process and deliver the summons to the United States Marshal for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 3/4/2021. (asho, )
|
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Ronette Landry. (Hunter, Horace) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (walk, ) |
| Notice of Correction re: Document #1 ; the filing user is requested to file the proposed summonses using the filing event - Proposed Summons - located under Other Documents. The filing user is requested to scan the three proposed summonses as one pdf before filing them electronically. The filing user is requested to contact the Clerk's Office if further assistance is needed. (walk, ) |
| Filing 1 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs filed by Ronette Landry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Complaint and #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (Hunter, Horace). Corrected docket entry on 03/02/2021 and regenerated NEF. (walk, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
