Turcotte v. Global Refining Group, Inc.
| Robert Turcotte d/b/a Premium Catalytic Converter Refining doing business as Premium Catalytic Converter Refining |
| Global Refining Group, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00138 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Henry E Hudson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Brett Lewis and Certification of Local Counsel Robert Powers Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-7758903. by Global Refining Group, Inc.. (Powers, Robert)
|
|
Filing 8
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Justin Mercer and Certification of Local Counsel Robert Powers Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-7758897. by Global Refining Group, Inc.. (Powers, Robert)
|
|
Filing 7
Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Global Refining Group, Inc.. (Powers, Robert)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to Complaint by Global Refining Group, Inc..(Powers, Robert)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Franklin Powers on behalf of Global Refining Group, Inc. (Powers, Robert)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Returned Executed on Global Refining Group, Inc. c/o Robert E. Hawthorne, Jr., Registered Agent on March 9, 2021, filed by Robert Turcotte. (Doner, Karen). Answer due date: March 30, 2021. Modified to correct docket text on 3/12/2021. (sbea,)
|
|
Notice of Correction re: #4 Affidavit of Service; Clerk spoke with filing attorney in regards to the service date. The correct event is "Summons Returned Executed" which will generate an answer due date of March 30, 2021. Clerk will correct the docket text and set the answer due date. No further action is required at this time. (sbea,)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Global Refining Group, Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (jsmi, )
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons by Robert Turcotte. (Doner, Karen)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0422-7655015.), filed by Robert Turcotte. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 to Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Doner, Karen)
|
|
Case assigned to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (jsmi, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Turcotte v. Global Refining Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Global Refining Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Robert Franklin Powers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Turcotte d/b/a Premium Catalytic Converter Refining doing business as Premium Catalytic Converter Refining | |
| Represented By: | Karen Ann Doner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
