Lewis v. Richmond Police Department et al
| Ronald Wayne Lewis |
| Victoria Pearson, Levy, Richmond Police Department, Urban and Gerald M. Smith |
| 3:2021cv00163 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| David J Novak |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice) that in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's request to proceed in form a pauperis is hereby DENIED; 2. The action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and, 3. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he may submit a new complaint with the full $400 filing fee. The Court will process such a complaint as a new civil action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 03/31/2021. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 03/31/2021. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Ronald Wayne Lewis. (walk, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT filed by Ronald Wayne Lewis against Levy, Victoria Pearson, Richmond Police Department, Gerald M. Smith and Urban. (walk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
