Meade v. Seville et al
Gregory Meade |
Mahmood Adnan Durrani, Mike Seville, Leonard Levin MD, Leonard Levin, MD and Superintendent Mike Seville |
3:2021cv00222 |
April 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Henry E Hudson |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Noelle Quam on behalf of Mahmood Adnan Durrani, Leonard Levin, MD (Quam, Noelle) |
Filing 11 ORDER that the defendant's Motion for Extension (Docket No. #10 ) is GRANTED, and Defendant Seville shall file his response to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before June 7, 2021. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 5/7/2021. (sbea,) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Mike Seville. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sessoms, Stacie) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stacie Ann Sessoms on behalf of Mike Seville (Sessoms, Stacie) |
Filing 8 ORDER (Granting Motion for Extension of Time). Upon due consideration, and finding it appropriate to do so, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants Levin and Durrani must file a response to the Complaint no later than June 4, 2021. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 5/6/2021. (sbea,) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Mahmood Adnan Durrani, Leonard Levin, MD. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fessier, Rosalie) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rosalie Pemberton Fessier on behalf of Mahmood Adnan Durrani, Leonard Levin, MD (Fessier, Rosalie) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory Meade Mike Seville served on 4/16/2021, answer due 5/7/2021 (Williams, Mario) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory Meade Leonard Levin, MD served on 4/16/2021, answer due 5/7/2021 (Williams, Mario) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory Meade Mahmood Adnan Durrani served on 4/13/2021, answer due 5/4/2021 (Williams, Mario) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Mike Seville, Leonard Levin, MD, and Mahmood Adnan Durrani. **NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for the Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon the Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (sbea,) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry E. Hudson. (sbea,) |
Notice of Correction re: #1 Complaint; Clerk replaced Complaint to include Civil Action Number and corrected party names and included "Party Text". In the future, filing attorney is to file "Proposed Summonses" as a separate filing event rather than as an attachment. The Civil Action Number is to be added to the Proposed Summonses. The "Proposed Summons" event is located under "Other Filings". No further action is required at this time. (sbea,) |
Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $402, Receipt Number: 0422-7705560), filed by Gregory Meade. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit Proposed Summons, #4 Exhibit Proposed Summons)(Williams, Mario). Clerk replaced Complaint to include Civil Action Number on 4/5/2021. Modified docket text on 4/5/2021. (sbea,) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.