Hughes v. Patell et al
| Samuel Hughes |
| Hampton Roads Regional Jail and Dr. Patell |
| 3:2021cv00232 |
| April 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John A Gibney |
| Elizabeth W Hanes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Consent to Collection of Fees by Samuel Hughes. (Attachments: #1 Resident Account Summary, #2 Envelope). (sbea,)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER that this action is CONDITIONALLY docketed; Plaintiff to submit statement as set out herein within 30 days of entry hereof; Clerk to obtain certified copy of Plaintiffs trust fund account for 6 month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action; Plaintiff to return the Consent to Collection of Fees form within thirty (30) days of entry hereof. See Order for details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 4/21/2021. Memorandum Order was mailed to the plaintiff. (sbea, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Samuel Hughes. (Attachment: #1 Envelope). (sbea,)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER COMPLAINT filed by Samuel Hughes against Dr. Patell and Hampton Roads Regional Jail. (Complaint was not signed). (Attachment: #1 Envelope). Modified docket text on 4/7/2021. (sbea,)
|
|
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Samuel Hughes. (sbea,)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
