Sirleaf v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Defendant: Unknown Doe, Jimmy Doe and Matiangai Arnett
Case Number: 3:2021cv00234
Filed: April 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth W Hanes
Referring Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2021 Filing 8 USCA Case Number 21-6784 USCA, TFischer, Case Manager for #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr. (tjoh, )
May 18, 2021 Filing 7 Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Court of Appeals re #6 Notice of Appeal (All case opening forms, plus the transcript guidelines, may be obtained from the Fourth Circuit's website at www.ca4.uscourts.gov) (tjoh, )
May 18, 2021 Assembled INITIAL Electronic Record Transmitted to 4CCA re #6 Notice of Appeal (tjoh, )
May 17, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL Received by Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr. No fee paid. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(asho, )
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; 2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and, 3. Plaintiff may submit a new complaint with the full $400 filing fee. The Court will process such a complaint as a new civil action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 04/29/2021. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
April 29, 2021 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 04/29/2021. It is so ORDERED. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (walk, )
April 7, 2021 Filing 3 Consent to Collection of Fees by Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr. (walk, )
April 7, 2021 Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form) by Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr. (walk, )
April 7, 2021 Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT filed by Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr. against Matiangai Arnett, Jimmy Doe and Unknown Doe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit D, #2 Exhibit E, #3 Exhibit F, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Summonses and #6 Envelope). (walk, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sirleaf v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmy Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matiangai Arnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?