Robert C. Smith, PLC et al v. Applestein
Plaintiff: Robert C. Smith, PLC and Robert Coleman Smith
Defendant: Allan Applestein
Case Number: 3:2021cv00246
Filed: April 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert E Payne
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2021 Filing 9 Reply to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Allan Applestein. (Gately, Caroline)
May 3, 2021 Filing 8 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Robert C. Smith, PLC. (Carrell, Daniel)
May 3, 2021 Filing 7 Memorandum in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Robert C. Smith, PLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit VSB Affidavit of Robert C. Smith)(Carrell, Daniel)
April 19, 2021 Filing 6 Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Corrected) filed by Allan Applestein. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Gately, Caroline)
April 19, 2021 Filing 5 DISREGARD - SEE ECF No. #6 Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Allan Applestein. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Gately, Caroline). Modified docket text on 4/20/2021. (sbea,)
April 19, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Allan Applestein. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gately, Caroline)
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Transfer Case; directing that the Clerk shall transfer this case to the Richmond Division of this Court. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 4/13/2021. (shea)
April 13, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to Transfer Case to Richmond Division by Allan Applestein. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Unopposed Motion to Transfer Division, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Waiver of Oral Argument)(Yates, Daniel)
April 13, 2021 Case transferred in from Alexandria Division. Case Number 1:21-cv-448. (tjoh, )
April 13, 2021 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (shea)
April 12, 2021 Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0422-7719965.), filed by Allan Applestein. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Gately, Caroline)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert C. Smith, PLC et al v. Applestein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert C. Smith, PLC
Represented By: Daniel A. Carrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Coleman Smith
Represented By: Daniel A. Carrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allan Applestein
Represented By: Caroline Petro Gately
Represented By: Daniel Clarke Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?