Jones v. Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center, Richmond
| William David Jones |
| Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center, Richmond |
| 3:2021cv00288 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| M Hannah Lauck |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center, Richmond, filed by William David Jones. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1, #2 Appendix 2, #3 Appendix 3, #4 Appendix 4, #5 Appendix 5, #6 Local Rule 83.1 Certification) (asho, )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER re #7 Motion to Amend Complaint; Pursuant to Rule 15 and finding that the interest of justice so require, the Court GRANTS the Motion. (ECF No. 7.) Jones SHALL file the Amended Complaint, within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 6/11/2021. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (asho, )
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Amend Complaint by William David Jones. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1, #2 Appendix 2, #3 Letter)(asho, )
|
|
Filing 6
Local Rule 83.1 Certification. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(asho, )
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE by Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center, Richmond of Related Case (Wu, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 4
Certificate Reporting Service. Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center, Richmond served on 5/12/2021, answer due 7/12/2021. (Wu, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Catherine Wu on behalf of Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center, Richmond (Wu, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center, Richmond, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Summons mailed to plaintiff for service of process with copy of Rule 4. (jsmi, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center, Richmond filed by William David Jones. Filing fee paid: $402.00. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 83.1 Certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jsmi, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/5/2021: #3 Receipt) (jsmi, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center, Richmond | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William David Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center, Richmond | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Catherine Wu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
