Andrews v. New Market Realty LLC et al
| Philip Andrews |
| New Market Realty LLC and Daniel Nieding |
| 3:2021cv00381 |
| June 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John A Gibney |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
FINAL ORDER. On August 1, 2021, the plaintiff filed a #3 notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court acknowledges this voluntary dismissal and DIRECTS the Clerk to close this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 8/5/2021. (sbea,)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Philip Andrews (Deal, David) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to New Market Realty LLC ATTN: Daniel Nieding and Daniel Nieding. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (jpow, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. (jpow, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-7838700.), filed by Philip Andrews. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit)(Deal, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
